low-bee.com

for the seeds
It is currently Tue Sep 07, 2010 4:56 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 9:36 am 
Offline
O.G. Bobby Johnson
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 13673
Location: Tuh-Rah-Nuh, Section 117 Row 4 Seat 21
with the new state immigration laws.
Pls, curious canadian wants to know

_________________
Diggy wrote:
and there you have it folks, christian is going to live forever like a men on films vampire.

STEW BEEF wrote:
just pure meat salads and fruits


“mutually strategic ignorance”
t.witter.com/OlCeePee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:44 pm 
Offline
O.G. Bobby Johnson
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2006 8:22 am
Posts: 13673
Location: Tuh-Rah-Nuh, Section 117 Row 4 Seat 21
really, noone wants to help me out with this...

_________________
Diggy wrote:
and there you have it folks, christian is going to live forever like a men on films vampire.

STEW BEEF wrote:
just pure meat salads and fruits


“mutually strategic ignorance”
t.witter.com/OlCeePee


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:59 pm 
Offline
older brother they call showbiz
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 22, 2008 5:59 pm
Posts: 955
Location: The Mexico of Europe.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arizona_SB_1070

Seems like they amended it so that it can only be enforced when someone is under investigation for a crime (i.e. they can't stop you randomly and check if you have your documents, but they can ask you for them if you so much as run a stop sign and they pull you over to give you a ticket for that). Fines and jail time got cut down considerably, especially for first time offenders. Also, the investigations can't be solely based on race, though I don't know how stridently that would be adhered to, or how you could even make sure it's followed...

_________________
FaceSpaceTwit

Brian wrote:
another outstanding panda thread/post


Dirty South Joe wrote:
panda, thanks for coming from the heart and beckin up appropriately when it was your time to shine.
you're kinda killin it on this board in your infinite panda-ness.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 10:55 pm 
Offline
O.G. Bobby Johnson
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 12:13 am
Posts: 6538
Location: Biscuitville
It's complicated. Basic idea: the Obama administration sued and got an injunction against the worst parts of thelaw. That means theyrenot thrown out but they can't enforce them.

_________________
Barack Obama wrote:
You listen to Grover? I listen to Grover.


http://www.95years.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:34 pm 
Offline
older cousin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:46 am
Posts: 182
i've been asked a hundred times for id by police when i wasnt doing anything wrong...just being fly. i guess i see the point that cops shouldnt be going around shooting fish in a barrel by ask every mexican-looking person for papers. but if some dudes are loitering in a parking lot and a cop roles through and asks for ids (like they've done to me in the past - and im white) and they aint got papers...fuck em. right?

i dont really get it. i gotta carry my id around. if you got papers, keep em on you. if you dont, be stealthier and dont go to the mall dumby.

is anything i said not accurate? cuz i dont really get it either.

_________________
Doli


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 3:41 pm 
Offline
O.G. Bobby Johnson
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2006 9:50 am
Posts: 3417
Do(nt)li(e) wrote:
i've been asked a hundred times for id by police when i wasnt doing anything wrong...just being fly. i guess i see the point that cops shouldnt be going around shooting fish in a barrel by ask every mexican-looking person for papers. but if some dudes are loitering in a parking lot and a cop roles through and asks for ids (like they've done to me in the past - and im white) and they aint got papers...fuck em. right?

i dont really get it. i gotta carry my id around. if you got papers, keep em on you. if you dont, be stealthier and dont go to the mall dumby.

is anything i said not accurate? cuz i dont really get it either.


"fuck em. right?" really? hope that's sarcasm. I walk my dog without my wallet, I'd be fucking furious if I got picked up and put through the whole immigration check for walking my dog.

Generally, you don't have to show the police your ID unless they think you are/have committed a crime. I know some courts have said asking for ID does not constitute a seizure, but I'd guess that most state laws are similar to Colorado's, wherein they have to have a reasonable suspicion before demanding ID.

You're under no obligation to carry an ID around unless you're driving a car/doing something that requires an ID or license.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:38 pm 
Offline
ol' head
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 06, 2006 2:23 pm
Posts: 2183
Location: DC
The law, if fully enacted, requires immigrants to carry around their "papers" at all time. It's a truly demoralizing and disturbing law, reminiscent of totalitarian regimes more than an American state.

_________________
Can't Escape from the Velodrome - New Mix
Myspace:
http://www.myspace.com/eddudes
http://www.myspace.com/letsgetstoked


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 4:58 pm 
Offline
older brother they call showbiz
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:00 am
Posts: 610
Location: The Meth Lab of Democracy
Do(nt)li(e) wrote:
im white


you sound white


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sat Jul 31, 2010 6:38 pm 
Offline
older cousin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:46 am
Posts: 182
makes more sense now. i didnt know what the actual physical papers were that they would have to carry on them. thought it would just be a kind of ID card or something. and i didnt know they could be thrown in a paddy wagon and interrogated if these papers were left at home. guess i didnt know anything about it at all...hence posting in "laymans terms..."

no need to get all racey, zhao. and when did you change your name to liability?

_________________
Doli


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:43 am 
Offline
O.G. Bobby Johnson
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:12 am
Posts: 10209
Location: non-complaining zone
Do(nt)li(e) wrote:
no need to get all racey, zhao. and when did you change your name to liability?


Liability is our requisite Native American Badass. He's kind of the polar opposite of Zhao.


Allowing state governments to worry about US citizenship is one slippery ass slope.

_________________
Shovel wrote:
There's never been a more exciting time to be old and white


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Sun Aug 01, 2010 2:52 pm 
Offline
ol' head
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 1932
Do(nt)li(e) wrote:
makes more sense now. i didnt know what the actual physical papers were that they would have to carry on them. thought it would just be a kind of ID card or something. and i didnt know they could be thrown in a paddy wagon and interrogated if these papers were left at home. guess i didnt know anything about it at all...hence posting in "laymans terms..."

no need to get all racey, zhao. and when did you change your name to liability?


the problem is that this doesn't just affect illegals, it affects anyone who looks brown. You as a citizen of this country are not required to carry any proof of citizenship. A permanent resident has a "green card" that they carry, also temporary work permits are issued for those applying for an adjustment of status, but that's it. So when officer bitchass pulls you over for being too mexican looking and asks for your proof of citizenship what do you do? They don't have access to a database to check that bullshit. Instead you are arrested and then someone has to bring them your birth certificate to get you out. This is straight bullshit. I don't give a shit how you feel like about illegal immigration but what this does to US citizens should piss you off, unless you're an idiot like these fucks in AZ who don't think latino americans are "real" citizens anyways.

_________________
http://beerandrap.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Laymans terms explain what did and didnt pass in Arizona
PostPosted: Mon Aug 02, 2010 4:24 pm 
Offline
older brother they call showbiz
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2008 1:00 am
Posts: 610
Location: The Meth Lab of Democracy
petty tenderass wrote:
Do(nt)li(e) wrote:
no need to get all racey, zhao. and when did you change your name to liability?


Liability is our requisite Native American Badass. He's kind of the polar opposite of Zhao.



i think Soap gets that title, he's probably in prison right now.

in other arizona news, the state also did away with any concealed carry permit requirements. i celebrated by buying a bulletproof vest.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brentabousko, skinny fresh, Squishfonk and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group